Environment assignment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Environment assignment - Essay ExampleQuestion 1d) According to Harvard University economist Jeffrey Sachs, Africa wishings US $10-20 billion a year to help it adequately combat human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS and other infectious diseases (Beresford, 2001). This is an amount that African states cannot raise on their own especially when one considers their weak economies that are creation crippled further by several disease pandemics. The developed countries would therefore be of help if they can support Africa by granting it money to combat HIV/AIDS. And when we say grant, we do not mean concessionary loans, we mean outright grants. Question 2) The precautionary principle has the following four central components taking preventive put to death in the face of uncertainty shifting the rouse of proof to the proponents of an activity exploring a wide range of alternatives to possibly harmful actions and increasing public confederacy in decision making (Kriebel et al., 2001). We a re of the opinion that anyone who wishes to introduce a new product or process, be tasked with proving that their new proposition will not harm the environment before performance. The first component of the precautionary principle if simply put states that it is better to be safe than sorry. With the world still uneffective to combat several big problems such as ecosystem degradation, resource depletion and climate change, and with environmental and health problems continuing to grow more rapidly than our ability to light upon solutions, Kriebel and Tickner (2001) state that it would be foolhardy to go ahead with new propositions that may create more problems in the future. The second and third components of the precautionary principle, shifting the burden of proof to the proponents of an activity and exploring a wide range of alternatives to possibly harmful actions, capture the effect of making investors stop and reflect deeply before proceeding with their new propositions. Th is means that it is up to the investor to research, bear the risk and come up with convincing data before launching a product or process. This would go a long way in arresting the quick money syndrome that is often the root cause of launching of untested products or processes. Also, increased stakeholder involvement as proposed by the precautionary principle makes it even more difficult for investors who may have fudged data to support their new offerings from launching their products or processes without a prior independent audit from the public. Question 3) The proposition that warmer weather translates into longer and better life, less energy consumption, and reduced outlays for clothing is too simplistic. For starters we need to define what is or is not warm. Of course the arguments put forth by What Are the Benefits of Global Warming? (n.d.) such as increase in reach for farming and living due to the acreage of ice on earth reducing, less money spent on heating and so on have their merits. However, these merits are only true to the extent that global warming leads to a rise in temperature to a level that can be defined as warm. Any deviation to this would lead to heat waves such as those experienced in Europe in 2003. A comprehensive study make by the World Health Organization (WHO) examined the correlation between climate change and the global burden of disease especially in the underdeveloped nations. The